PDA Technical Glossary
PDA Technical Reports are highly valued membership benefits because they offer expert guidance and opinions on important scientific and regulatory topics and are used as essential references by industry and regulatory authorities around the world. These reports include terms which explain the material and enhance the reader’s understanding.
The database presented here includes the glossary terms from all current technical reports. The database is searchable by keyword, topic, or by technical report. Each definition provided includes a link to the source technical report within the PDA Technical Report Portal.
(Please select "All" to restart a filtered Search)
Refine Results
Filter By Technical Report Number
- TR 14: Validation: Protein Purification Chromatography (3)
- TR 60: Process Validation (2)
- TR 74: Reprocessing of Biopharmaceuticals (2)
- TR 38: Manufacturing Chromatography Systems Postapproval Changes (ChromPAC) (2)
- TR 48: Moist Heat Sterilizer Systems (1)
- TR 54: QRM:Manufacturing Operations (1)
- TR 56: Phase Appropriate cGMP Application (1)
- TR 64: Temp Controlled Systems Qualification (1)
- TR 67: Objectionable Microorganisms (1)
- TR 69: Bioburden/Biofilm Management (1)
- TR 72: Passive Thermal Protection Systems: Qualification/Operations (1)
- TR 60-3: Process Validation: A Lifecycle Approach: Bio Drug Sub Mfg (1)
- TR 88: Microbial Data Deviation Investigations in the Pharmaceutical Industry (1)
- TR 29: Validation: Cleaning (1)
- TR 60-2: Process Validation: A Lifecycle Approach, Annex 1: Oral Solid Dosage/Semisolid Dosage Forms (1)
- TR 54-5: Quality Risk Management for the Design, Qualification, and Operation of Manufacturing Systems (1)
- TR 44: QRM: Aseptic Processes (1)
Filter By Technical Report Keyword
Filter By Technical Report Category
Acceptance Criteria
Numerical limits, ranges, or other suitable measures for acceptance of test results. (TR 14) (TR 29) (TR 38) (TR 64)
Numerical limits, ranges, or other suitable measures for acceptance of test results. Exceeding the acceptable range for a critical parameter during subsequent validation studies may result in questionable product quality that would require initiation of an investigation. Exceeding the operating range should be documented and explained in the validation report and evaluated for validation study impact. (TR 42)
The pre-defined specifications, standards or ranges that must be met under stated test conditions. (TR 48)
Numerical limits, ranges, or other suitable measures for acceptance of the results of analytical method validation that is satisfied to determine suitability of test method performance.(TR 57) (TR 69) (TR 72) (TR 74)
The criteria that a system or component must satisfy in order to be accepted by a user or other authorized entity. (TR 54-5)
Numerical limits, ranges, or other suitable measures for acceptance of the results of analytical procedures which the drug substance or drug product or materials at other stages of their manufacture should meet (16). Exceeding the acceptable range for a critical parameter during subsequent validation studies may result in questionable product quality that would require initiation of an investigation and possible batch rejection. (TR60)
Source:
Drug Product (DP)
A pharmaceutical product type that contains a drug substance, generally, in association with excipients. [Synonym: Dosage Form; Finished Product] (TR57)(TR14)(TR42)
A finished dosage form (e.g., tablet, capsule, or solution) that contains a drug substance, generally, but not necessarily, in association with one or more other ingredients.(TR38) (TR67) (TR88)
The dosage form in the final immediate packaging intended for marketing.(TR60)(TR82)
Source:
Process Validation
The documented evidence that the process, operated within established parameters, can perform effectively and reproducibly to produce an intermediate or API (drug substance) meeting its predetermined specifications and quality attributes. (TR14) (TR42)
Establishing documented evidence which provides a high degree of assurance that a specific process will consistently produce a product meeting its predetermined specifications and quality attributes. (TR44)
The collection and evaluation of data, from the process design stage through commercial production, which establishes scientific evidence that a process is capable of consistently delivering quality products. (TR54) (TR57) (TR74)
The collection and evaluation of data, from the process design stage through commercial production, which establishes scientific evidence that a process is capable of consistently delivering quality product.
The documented evidence that the process, operated within established parameters, can perform effectively and reproducibly to produce a medicinal product meeting its predetermined specifications and quality attributes, as described in EMA, EU GMP, Part 1, Annex 15, drug/medicinal product. (TR56)
EMA: The documented evidence that the process, operated within established parameters, can perform effectively and reproducibly to produce a medicinal product meeting its predetermined specifications and quality attributes.
US FDA: The collection and evaluation of data, from the process design stage through commercial production, which establishes scientific evidence that a process is capable of consistently delivering quality products. (TR60-2)
The documented evidence that the process, operated within established parameters, can perform effectively and reproducibly to produce an intermediate or drug substance meeting its predetermined specifications and quality attributes (1, 17). (TR60-3)